KNOWLEDGESTREAM AT-A-GLANCE
Bringing Innovation into Company Workflow
ABSTRACT
Evolutionary Changes in the Pace of Innovation -Explore how New Data Sources, Analytics, Access to Experts are intersecting to impact businesses to innovate faster and keep up with the increased pace of their respective markets. What needs to be true about the future solutions that finally move innovation out of the program office and into the workflow of business?
PARTICIPANTS
OBJECTIVES
1. :
2. :
3. :
4. :
End Date: Apr 12, 2018
CONTRIBUTIONS
ACTIVITY
429 Days
20 Themes
49 Contributors
878 Posts
1412 Comments
332 Followers
OUTPUTS
None yet
THEME #1
Thinking of the companies you know, what is today's status quo approach to idea generation?
THEME #2
Thank you for an engaging first week, Advisors! This week, let's talk about communications systems l...
THEME #3
Does "Innovation" need to be a separate function?
THEME #4
Learning From Models of Innovation
THEME #5
A More Scientific Approach to Product Development?
THEME #6
KPIs - Leading indicators and measuring results
THEME #7
ERP for innovation???
THEME #8
Detecting and Managing Disruption
THEME #9
Scenario 1: Speed of Active Learning & Innovation
THEME #10
Scenario 2: The Future of Talent Development (inspired by Steve Jones)
THEME #11
Scenario 3- Finding Value Creators
THEME #12
Scenario 4: Learning a living
THEME #13
Business Model Innovation
THEME #14
Millennial Mentorship
SURVEYS
THEME #15
Internal Open Innovation
THEME #16
A Future State for Accelerated Pace of Learning
THEME #17
Managing team composition and dynamics for radical innovation
SURVEYS
Project team leader
Christine Hade wrote:
Project leader - that person has been put in place due to a belief in their ability to lead tasks and talent. They should be responsible for assembling the team. a good leader will of course seek feedback from others
Frank Dethier wrote:
Depends on how the organization is set-up, but definitively a combination of the project leader/program manager with somebody with bigger weight like VP of Innovation
Dawn Houghton wrote:
Innovation Director, someone specializing in leading innovation teams. If company doesn't have specific innovation team, then an R&D Director.
Falguni Desai wrote:
Head of Project and P&L
The person running the team should be making these decisions about transitioning resources and making sure the right talent is there for the right task and right phase. This person should also have P&L accountability and responsibility so that their decisions are aligned holistically.
Steve Jones wrote:
The manager (assisted and perhaps coached by his/her upline manager) is responsible for the success AND failure of the team. Team composition, inclusion, and leadership of team members set the condition for the evolving capacity and (hopefully increased) effectiveness of the team.
Paolo Beffagnotti wrote:
Successful people makes a project successful. The management is accountable to select an appropriate team composition. Operators are needed to extend the core business, business builders to develop new opportunities and visionaries to have sustainable options. Ideation is more the brainstorming step, collect as many idea as possible. Review these and as soon as you validate and select the ones that could be valuable for your business, you can then implement these. Best practices in managing a dynamic and open team composition are to select the skills needed and then identify the valuable team members. Orchestrate the team performance, you could win all together and loose alone. Select the rules of play and clarify the final goal. Build relationships to create consensus.
THEME #18
How Can Convetit Better Help Clients Innovate?
SURVEYS
Companies face many blind spots around innovation and learning
innovation is being stifled & decimated as it failed to travels up through the organization from those closest to customers, first and second level managers of sales ops teams have no responsibility for migrating innovation up and for improving related programs. In fact, many of them resist and push back on innovative ideas submitted from the field. Most of them are focused on administration, reporting and compliance of broken and sub-optimized systems.
So many are head down working through execution of initiatives and strategy that they sometimes miss the larger picture
culture of not being allowed to make mistakes by learningpeople that have a fixed mindset (and not a growth mindset)fuzzy definition and broad scope of learning
Often what appears to be a blind spot on the surface is quite known among teams
Often good recommendations and plans fail due to poor implementation and/or lack of expertise
A key benefit of Convetit is access to a broad range of experts who are unencumbered by internal organization's thinking and biases
using Convetit can save time and money and improve the quality of learning. As a market researcher, Convetit is quite unique and provides much needed learning for marketing, strategy, and R&D functions.
As it is an external board, it is not beholden to the corporate organization as it would be free from the intrenal "misconceptions " (politics) which tends to skew the process and objective. It would also call into question topics, and subject mater/material which is considered taboo
What makes Convetit unique is the best sharing of experiences from numerous experts from varies industries, backgrounds and cultures - this is definitely a point of difference.Clients/corporates are not only able to get recommendation to problem statements but also perspectives from different industries, countries, cultures, etc - all in one :-)
Panel members believe they can add more value if provided an opportunity. The more actionable the "ask" the more they can help
If experts would be motivated not only to discuss, but also provide broader practical answers to given scenario (good practices from their own experience, from what they have learnt/seen in companies they have worked for, what they have discovered throughout the years), the client would get a number of proven ways to choose from
Key opportunity is for convetit to expand to implementation services
some experts very passionate about the solution - wonder whether these experts also get a chance to work with the client on implementation
Another offering could be proposals for actual implementation of the ideas chosen by the client - some of us may actually provide an implementation plan that the client couldchoose. In this way the passionate expert (or its company/partners/etc) can help implement together with the company, earn a revenue and Convetit could earn a commission from the deal as well as being seen as an enabler to propose and help IMPLEMENT solutions to problem statements raised by the client
beyond the consulting services the actual implementation could be offered (if capabilities in place)
Additional recommendations
I would definitely offer examples of using the tools to improve process/capability by tapping into experts AND also examples of using the tools to build knowledge to inform and influence projects.
there are ways to capture more information through better survey tools. The Priority Map and Media Feed are probably being underutilized today
If the platform can use AI to create an initial summary of each themes and the related media feeds and then feeds this summary to the facilitator for fine tuning and summarization, it would help.
I also voted for case studies and am surprised I'm the only one. My thinking was it is hard for outsiders to help companies implement, but easy to provide advice or solve problems. The idea would be the company presents the case study to focus on the roadblocks and the advisory board helps find solutions.
THEME #19
Crowdsourcing Innovation
THEME SUMMARY
Crowdsourcing Needs a Rebrand
- Many negatives and limitation perceived with Crowdsourcing
- The space has grown to include many different solutions that go overlooked.
- Very few practices have been adopted by large enterprise
SURVEYS
Few
corporations offer technologies, that are not core-technology to the corporate but still interested to expand into, to startups or collaboration partners - these would take the technology forward via finding possible applications, developing prototypes and scaling the technology up.
Crowd-sourcing with clear coordination of ideas and well-managed work streams could provide a catalyst for innovation.
THEME #20
Final Thoughts- Keep Asking