KNOWLEDGESTREAM AT-A-GLANCE

Leading Through Disruptions

ABSTRACT

How are industries, brands, and people adapting to the disruptions happening around them?

PARTICIPANTS

Sumant Parimal
Partner and Chief Analyst of '5 Jewels Research' at Innogress, Also Partner at Stark Consulting Services Inc.
Rob Bickford
COO, SVP, CIO and President
Jay D
Ullasa Bhat
CEO - BUS Global Consulting
Laureen Schroeder
Chief Marketing Officer
Fehmida Kapadia
Helping organizations adopt a customer-centric approach to manage their innovation and marketing strategy.
Michael Phelan
Start-Up CMO, Founder & Principal Go-to-Market Pros
Patrick Henz
Head of GRC US, Regional Compliance Officer Americas, Futurist, Storyteller, AI.
Bill Roth
Business Coach And Writer
Falguni Desai
Head of Digital Strategy & Transformation
Don Barefoot
Principal/CEO of Integrity CEO Advisors
Jacobs Edo
Trusted Advisor | Enterprise & Solution Architect | Public Speaker | Author
Ian Gibson
Professor at University of Twente
Olaf Zwijnenburg
OmniChannel Executive (Retail, Wholesale, FMCG)
Nick Wilsher
Future of Work Venture lead
View More >

OBJECTIVES

1. Change Trends/Drivers: Determine the challenges, drivers, trends and frictions of disruption.
theme 1

2. Disruptions: Develop an understanding of market disruptions supported by examples.
theme 2, 3

3. Truths of Impending Disruption: Define the key characteristics that would need to be true to anticipate disruption.
theme 6

4. Proact/React to Disruption: Define the recommended path(s) for a viable solution and identify critical success factors in deployment.
theme 3, 4, 5, 6

100% Complete
Start Date: Nov 6, 2018
End Date: Feb 5, 2019
2765

CONTRIBUTIONS

ACTIVITY

91 Days

6 Themes

28 Contributors

1141 Posts

1624 Comments

202 Followers

OUTPUTS

6 Slide Deck

5 Blog Post

6 Video

CALLS ATTENDED

2018-10-24 15:30:38 - A recording of the Scoping Call & Talent Review was uploaded

2019-01-03 19:03:43 - A recording of the Check-in Call was uploaded

2019-03-15 - Check-in call

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Key learnings across six themes:
- Disruptions happen when consumer needs are not being met.
- Consumer expectations are rapidly increasing.
- Rapid advances in technology has fueled innovation causing market disruption.
- Digital revolution is changing how business is conducted through business model innovation.
- Rate of market disruption is fast and expected to increase in the future.
- Companies must be willing to disrupt themselves or they will self destruct.
- Serial disruptor companies continually reinvent themselves.
- Market leaders find it difficult to self-disrupt since they have been successful for a long time.
- Visionary leaders drive disruption and integrate it into the strategic planning process.
- CEO is required to drive change while CMO is expected to drive vision based on customer knowledge.
- Self-disruption thrives in cultures valuing change, innovation, and continual learning.
- Timing disruption is difficult to predict but can't be too early or too late.
- Disruption strategy must be proactive and consider prediction tools.
- Even traditional companies can learn to manage risk and adopt new practices.

RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS

3-5 Bulletpoints on Key Recommendations from the panel
1. BBDO to deep dive into discussion board learning, mine the data.
2. BBDO to use learning to help clients via Currnt deliverables or own interpretations.
3. Consider using Disruption Board to tackle actual client problems
4. Consider using Currnt Sprints to solve specific client problems

THEME #1

Trends & Drivers

THEME SUMMARY

The digital revolution has led to disruption across many markets. Consumer expectations are increasing and the rate of disruption is likely to increase in the future. Companies, especially established market leaders, are challenged to adapt in order to survive and thrive.

  • Disruption happens when consumer needs are not being met.
  • Rapid changes in technology have fueled disruption in many markets.
  • The digital revolution is changing business models and customer expectations. Technology trends enable big changes.
  • It is difficult for market leaders to self-disrupt.

SURVEYS

people | 16
How do you think the rate of disruption will change in the next ten years versus the past ten years?
- a lot slower
0.00% 0 votes
- a bit slower
0.00% 0 votes
- about the same
18.75% 3 votes
- a bit faster
18.75% 3 votes
- a lot faster
62.50% 10 votes
 

5. Future of Disruption - Rate of disruption is likely to increase and it will be challenging for companies to keep up. Market leaders must learn to adapt. Think regulatory, technical, climate change.

Serial disruption is an interesting concept and challenge for business leaders. The bar gets higher and higher. I think it will be fascinating to watch as creativity will reach new heights in the goal of serial disruption.

creativity is important: the more ideas, the higher the possibility that one of them will really be a success. A requirement for creative companies is an efficient internal structure, with as little bureaucracy as possible (ensured by GRC). An open culture supports employees to develop ideas.

existing giants think they are so big in size and resources no one can disrupt them. They believe in their ability to acquire a disruptor, so they stay focused on their core strengths...wait & watch to avoid risk. Decision makers must answer to board/shareholders who are fine enjoying profits.

1. Why Disruption? - Markets are ripe for disruption when customer needs are not being met. Once new offerings disrupt the market, the market changes, companies respond, and the customer wins.

Disruption is caused by an existing industry overserving or underserving customers. If players in an industry serve customers well, there won't be enough pull for that industry to be disrupted. For major disruptions in any market, customers aren't getting what they want.

Disruptive strategy is about better serving customers who were ignored, or out of radar, of big players in similar businesses. It is also about exploring and establishing new market segments through disruptive innovative business models that were out of the mind of existing player.

The real disruption is understanding what consumers value (and their willingness to pay). Finding the sweet spot between want-need-value is fertile ground for disruption (and often is where customers are under- or overserved)

4. Trends in Disruption - digital transformation will continue, disruption will lead to more disruption, successful corporate cultures will be more creative, self-disruption will be self-defense.

One trend that I have seen is what may be referred to as 'serial disruption'. By this, I mean once an initial product or service has proved to be disruptive, it sets the company off in a different direction.

winners of emerging disruptive trends will be able to create new corporate cultures where technology empowers people to evolve, adapt, and drive change.

Self disruption is a becoming more of a trend in all types of business models.

3. Drivers of Disruption - Drivers are diverse ranging from unmet needs, business model changes, advancements in technical capability even government/regulatory change.

I think "value" was pivotal in many Health & Beauty business model changes..Value often is more than price. Overpriced industries are ripe for disruption. Most HBA examples came when the entire consumer model wanted more for less and the industries evolved from there.

Three essential driving pillars of markets being disrupted - regulatory complacency, customer adoption efforts, and customer experience.

Industry ripe for disruption has a lot of dissatisfied customers...we have seen many industries being disrupted because there had been no new innovation for decades and customers were very unhappy. Transport, hospitality, healthcare, education are all undergoing disruption due to dissatisfaction.

2. Trends Driving Disruption - Demographics, globalization, mobility, environmental awareness, digitalization plus advances in technology, e-commerce, social media are a perfect storm for disruption.

a few non-technical trends: 1. Changing customer expectations. 2. Changing global environment conditions 3. Global political unrest:

Economic history is a story of disruption driven by technologies, demographics and climate/disease. Today’s economic disruption is driven by: destructive end of Industry Age, emergence of Information Age, global demographics with urban tech communities + Info Age generations, climate change/obesity.

disruptive trends - Growth/adoption of digital trust, Increasing workforce mobility & virtualization, Intelligent automation & Industry 4.0, Platform economy/serialization of disruption, Predictable disruption.

THEME #2

Disruption Winners & Losers

THEME SUMMARY

We can learn from market disruption's winners and losers. Big companies willing to disrupt themselves to delight customer will survive and thrive. Others focused solely on quarterly financials risk failing due to disruption.

  • Winners must continuously reinvent themselves.
  • Losers must
  • WILL FINISH REPORT ON GOOGLE DOCS

SURVEYS

people | 15
Please choose the five (5) statements you most AGREE with.....For big companies to survive disruption in their market, they MUST:
- monitor trends
33.33% 5 votes
- always be learning
33.33% 5 votes
- focus on meeting consumer needs/solving customer problems
40.00% 6 votes
- be willing to take risks
53.33% 8 votes
- try new business models
33.33% 5 votes
- be the thought leader in the industry
0.00% 0 votes
- pay attention to the customer value equation
13.33% 2 votes
- make quick decisions/act quickly
26.67% 4 votes
- have a visionary leader
40.00% 6 votes
- have a creative culture
40.00% 6 votes
- have an entrepreneurial culture
46.67% 7 votes
- think big
0.00% 0 votes
- operate globally
0.00% 0 votes
- focus on the next generation
20.00% 3 votes
- be willing to disrupt/reinvent themselves
66.67% 10 votes
- always stay relevant
6.67% 1 vote
- explore new technologies
26.67% 4 votes
- invest for the long term
26.67% 4 votes
- lead government/regulatory relationships in the industry
6.67% 1 vote
- know what your competitors are doing
13.33% 2 votes
- clearly define what business you are in
6.67% 1 vote
- watch what start-ups are doing
33.33% 5 votes
 

Lessons from Losers - Even the most successful companies can be destroyed by disruption. Losers seem to resist change and avoid risk until it is too late to recover.

"Loser" had early success in capturing a market with few competitors but was unable to anticipate the impact disruptors would have on its business. Falling into the ‘success trap’, they neglected the need to explore new territory and enhance their long-term viability and went bankrupt. - Polaroid

"Loser" ignored the market and continued to produce products that seemed antiquated in a new app-driven environment. Management felt they were basically too big to fail. They were too slow to recognize seismic changes in the market. - Blackberry

"Loser" literally created the concept but did not move fast enough to shift its business model or continue investing. Competitors kept introducing new technologies. A great case study in how NOT to do business. Company is bankrupt, parts may survive, but they were wiped out by disruption. - Sears

Lessons from Winners - Innovative companies who focus on meeting customer needs will survive and thrive. Importantly, they are able to reinvent themselves.

"Winner" is the quintessential example of a successful "fast follower." They learned from the existing offerings, created a superior service, and disrupted the information industry. "Winner" continues to disrupt. - Google

"Winner" solved real customer problems and disrupted the market space. "Winner" survives disruption as it evolves business model, does whatever people want, is not married to anything, is always open to reinventing itself, and whatever the next big thing will be they will embrace it.- Netflix

"Winner" was formed in 1792. Even with decades of disruption, they continue to grow. They lead in innovation, technology, and superior quality product. Quality of service is unparalleled. Technology has always been cutting edge. - NYSE

Disruptive Insights - It's important for companies to be fast learners to recognize rapidly changing markets. New business models are redefining industries. Even the biggest companies will win or lose

Critical is recognizing metrics defining winning/losing are changing. Today will not be like tomorrow. “Winning” business models are evolving as they solve for simultaneous multiple equations created by disruptive technologies, disruptive entrepreneurship and the pace consumers embrace disruption.

The common thread among all losers across different and diverse business segments is one standout aspect - inability and/or unwillingness to disrupt one's own business success. They have been lulled into complacency with their seemingly monopolistic success built over a prior disruption.

Only around 12% of firms who appeared in 1955 Fortune 500 list have survived in 2017 list. 88% of the companies from 1955 list have either gone bankrupt, merged with (or were acquired by) another firm, or they still exist but have fallen from the top Fortune 500 companies list.

Winners - netflix, tesla - google - nintendo ? cipro nyse amazon gopro apple iphone organic food dr pepper platforms without assets - uber, airbnb microsoft

What are the winners telling us? 1. Only the paranoid survive. 2. Be agile 3. Keep your ear to the ground. 4. Don't get married to an idea or business model.

Losers - blackberry university of phoenix - traditional universities sears - local hardware blockbuster - atari polaroid yahoo! GM / automotive / kodak / apple

What are losers telling us: 1. Don't try to fight change or disruption. 2. Don't deny. It is so tempting to simply tell yourself, 3. Be ready to take bold steps 4. Don't be afraid to reinvent yourself.

Survey - For big companies to survive they must be willing to reinvent, take risk, meeting needs solve problems, monitor trends, always learn, visionary leader, creative & entrepreneurial culture

Trends undergo changes, customers might strongly gravitate to new experiences when first introduced. But over time, they figure out their preferences. Disruption allows the customer to experiment with something new and decide if they want to keep the new or go back to the old or a combination.

THEME #3

Disrupt Yourself

THEME SUMMARY

It is very difficult for successful companies to disrupt themselves. Leaders must be visionary and culture must value innovation. Planning process must explore offensive and defensive disruption strategies to get timing right. Using external resources can be faster and manage risk of self-disruption

  • Leaders must consider disruption in the strategic planning process.
  • Timing of self-disruption is critical - can't be too early or too late.
  • Corporate culture of learning, change, and innovation help a company to self-disrupt.

How - Continuous learning and innovation help to drive self-disruption. Acquisition and partnerships help make disruption happen faster. Proactive disruption is stronger than reactive.

Prevent complacency, instill a culture of constant learning and innovation by actively pursuing areas adjacent to core competencies.: - Define guardrails to unleash team potential - Observe, experiment and, integrate - Avoid legacy thinking -Instill a culture of learning and innovation

Acquire - For Walmart to grow their online business model and compete with Amazon they needed to self disrupt and had to acquire to make it happen. They identified future competition, looked at their own strengths/weaknesses, and reinvented though acquisition of jet.com and its visionary CEO

any reactive self disruptive actions can be easily copied by a competitor. Proactive disruptions based on very long term futuristic plannings (time horizon of 50-100 yrs) are very tough to copy in a mere one year or two years time line.

What - self-disruption needs to be an important consideration in the strategic planning process. Leaders need to create the company's best future.

Leadership of the company who wants to get self disrupted should ask them selves periodic questions like: i. Who we are? ii. What are our purpose? iii. What are our business? Iv. Who are our customers? v. Who are our competitors? vi. What are our value delivery propositions?

Internally-led disruption is challenging. Polaroid. knew it needed to disrupt itself and took many positive steps to disrupt. And yet, they went bankrupt. The biggest aspect was that their internal planned disruption was not "disruptive enough"

WHAT must a company do to be able to self-disrupt? # 1 :Company must be able to imagine a future where the current self does not exist. This is the most intrinsic need to be able to self-disrupt but at the same time, it can the most challenging act emotionally.

Who - Self-disruption requires a culture of change, strong R&D, and a visionary leader. Companies need to remember disruption will impact everyone in the company.

To keep a culture of change and potential disruption it is beneficial to have an independent R&D department where a group of nerds can play around with ideas for new products, solutions and processes. Creative employees can show up with great new ideas, if given space to breathe,

The disruption of the organization requires personal disruptions of the group-members...Employees with a “private life” receive input from different settings. Inspirations and fresh ideas get back to the company and due to this, the employee gets more valuable for the organization.

A visionary leader is necessary. Self disruption is a top-down phenomenon as most successful self-disruptions can be traced to the very top. The self-disruptor-in-chief is a visionary leader who has both ability to foresee what market would need in future and the vision to bring disruption to life.

Why - the catalyst or cause for disruption can be internal or external. Companies with innovation goals drive their own disruption offensively. Others self-disrupt when threatened by market change.

3M have a policy aimed at replacing its products so that one third of all revenue is generated by products less than 5 years into the development cycle. Whilst this is not easy to control, it is a policy that allows you to let go.

Fintech companies have been forced to disrupt themselves due to several factors. Increased Regulation Demographic changes Technologies rapid ascent The Financial Crisis

When - self-disruption is risky and difficult to time. Too early will require investment and may not succeed. Too late and you may not be able to recover.

When is the exact time to kick start self disruption is the tipping point in winning and surviving disruptive waves. Most of the industry leaders fail to visualize the timing when they should launch their self disruptive initiatives.

No CEO is incentivized to disrupt their business and jeopardize steady growth and predictable earnings. Until it is too late....It is only when sales are going down, earnings are missed, and competitors have already advanced that panic sets in and then everyone is talking about disruption.

Self-disrupt NOW or Self-destruct later! The self-disruption crystal ball can be looked at in a few ways - 1) Life cycle 2) Obsolescence 3) First Mover IP 4) Competition

THEME #4

Disruption is Coming, What Would You Do?

THEME SUMMARY

The Board has shared advice to help the CMO create a F500 Disruption Strategy. Strategy must be proactive and part of the strategic planning process. CMOs need to own customer understanding to create the vision. Top leaders must drive the strategy and ensure the culture and people have capability

  • Disruption strategy must be proactive, not reactive.
  • CEO must drive disruption strategy.
  • CMO knows the consumer, market, trends to create vision.
  • People and Culture need to be capable of delivering.

SURVEYS

people | 15
In fortune 500 companies, which C-level leaders are the most important to achieving self-disruption? (you may select TWO)
Chief Executive Officer
93.33% 14 votes
Chief Operating Officer
13.33% 2 votes
Chief Financial Officer
13.33% 2 votes
Chief Marketing Officer
40.00% 6 votes
Chief Strategy Officer
53.33% 8 votes
Chief Technology Officer
20.00% 3 votes
Chief Information Officer (IT)
6.67% 1 vote
Chief Talent Officer (HR)
0.00% 0 votes
Chief Knowledge Officer
0.00% 0 votes
Chief Compliance Officer
0.00% 0 votes
Chief Legal Officer
0.00% 0 votes
Chief Growth Officer
26.67% 4 votes
 

Disruption strategy must be proactive. Many companies, especially F500, are not prepared. Strategic planning process needs to include tracking early signals of market change.

If you are reacting to disruption, you are already too late.

Accenture found 93% of Business Leaders know their industry will be disrupted at some point in the next 5 years, but only 20% feel they’re highly prepared to address it. There is high gap between sense of disruption and sense of urgency of having disruption strategy in place.

...firms should develop a mechanism to continually capture data which may act as leading indicators for launching self disruption (proactive disruption)..

Disruption strategy needs to be part of the strategic planning process. Process must ask fundamental questions to allow for potential disruption and Blue Ocean strategies.

Creating disruption strategy does not need to be over-complicated. Smart approaches define: - self awareness- how do we see ourselves? how we can disrupt ourselves? - market trends- what do customers want? how can we be better than others? - SWOT- what's needed to disrupt? work on economies of scale

I prefer a proactive Self Disruption Strategic Framework developed and implemented for evidence based strategic planning and self disruptive strategies because I believe self disruption is a Blue Ocean Strategy exposing you to new sets of markets which are not even imagined by your competitors.

Disruption strategy requires strong leadership from the top of the organization. The more successful the company, the bigger the challenge for the CEO to lead disruption.

CEO Commitment To Disruptive Change. Anything less than this means disruption is an exercise and not a core business attribute. Think Jobs or Musk.

Many companies don't have the visionary executives to organically build new products or business models. The average Csuite knows how to manage a stable business. Faster way to introduce disruptive options is to setup a small CFO acquisition fund to evaluate/acquire a few disruptive business models.

Leadership in a disruptive environment is achieved by creating a vision before there is compelling evidence. Think Noah. Executing a disruptive vision before there is compelling consumer/voter demand is the leadership and marketing challenge facing every business in today’s Age of Disruption.

CMOs play an important role in driving disruption. They know the customer, customer needs/problems, the market, and trends helping them define a future vision for the company.

CMOs must take the role of a futurist to deliver the strategy and growth initiatives with the customer experience at the center, revenue as the end goal The disruptive growth team would completely depend on who could deliver the goal of increased ROI and a better customer experience.

Start with target customer and prospect interviews on the critical problems they urgently want to solve. Follow by identifying and analyzing customers or prospects who are best-in-class at solving these most pressing, relevant problems.

"Think before you go!" Before creating a strategy where to go and how, I have to know exactly where I stand. This may require support by external market research agencies. I also need to know, where I want to be in future, This could be continuous evolution or a revolution (disruption).

Staffing to develop/implement disruption strategy must be well chosen to include diversity, creativity, entrepreneurial skills. Special teams and/or consultants are often tasked with disruption.

Fund a Skunkworks team with a very specific mission to innovate, replicate, or expand offerings. Team should be selected for its robust complementary skills and high-energy entrepreneurial drive. I'd have the Skunkworks team report to a senior executive (COO or CEO).

Get the Right People. In disruption strategy work less is more. All need to have great people skills/soft skills to elicit and communicate/debate ideas. Look for people with following experience types: financial/planning, marketing, product/design, technology, sales/communications, and project mgmt.

...let the professionals handle this, find a great team of consultants and let them drive the process. A management consulting firm will definitely incorporate team input, but they are best equipped to carry the firm forward in the shortest possible timeframe and also bring external input.

Corporate culture must be ready to handle disruption as it affects everyone in the corporation.

Set up a culture of innovation and change management plus: complete understanding of the business environment, an eye for innovation and competition, value management as it relates to business processes/customers/platforms, forward looking technological approaches for enabling efficiency.

Manage Internal Disruption. Work associates viewing disruption as a personal threat are saboteurs who create a us vs. them civil war within the organization. A culture supportive of disruptive change, enabled through an actionable HR plan, is the only way that disruption can be sustained

THEME #5

Changing Corporate Culture

THEME SUMMARY

Corporate culture can help or hurt the ability to innovate or change in disruptive times. Strong cultures need to continuously evolve and toxic cultures need to be fixed. However, changing culture is hard. Some companies find success by starting small. Luckily, there are good cultural role models.

  • Keep the best of culture to fuel a strong future.
  • Changing culture is hard and requires change management.
  • Learn from companies with strong cultures.

SURVEYS

people |
Thinking about corporate cultures at big, established Fortune 500 companies, name one value or belief that might make it difficult for the company to survive and thrive in disruptive markets. Then add a few words explaining why (keep it short please).
Ullasa Bhat wrote:
Resting on past glory -
Believing that there is no need to change with the illusion that status-quo is great and further propagate cynicism on any new ideas, thoughts or efforts towards change.
There is no better way to perish in disruptive markets than the above belief.

Sumant Parimal wrote:
Legacy based identity and fear of loosing that identity in case they try reinventing themselves in spirit of disruptions.

Michael Phelan wrote:
Inquisitive

Fehmida Kapadia wrote:
"We have been doing this for X years, we know how it works" There is often complacency that because the existing business model and processes and culture has worked for so long, it will continue to work and there is no need for change.

Jay D wrote:
"Ignorance due to arrogance"

Arrogant people have closed minds, they are overly confident of their knowledge and vision, and they routinely underestimate threats. This toxic combination of ignorance and arrogance will destroy a corporation.

Hasnain Zaheer wrote:
The expertise that some of the most high performing executives have gained over the years in existing products and processes is a big factor in their reluctance to engage with any new new or innovative ideas. They believe in the effectiveness of the current products and initiatives and have the evidence to show that it works.

Don Barefoot wrote:
An Ineffective Board Chairman and dysfunctional approach to Board governance that's blind to the need to remain engaged, dynamic, and "mission true": typically either a prestigious "arms-length" board that's honorary/perfunctory" or a disunified board of self-focused personalities where multiple strong voices pull in disparate directions.

Patrick Henz wrote:
"We already did it that way" --> Change pushes employees (incl. management) out of their comfort zones. When the organizations is still doing fine and risks perceived as far away, change of culture may lead to resistance.

Ricardo Santos wrote:
Trust in startups. Most of biggest innovations from corporations come from startup acquisitions (e.g. Siri by Apple, Deep Mind by Google).

Falguni Desai wrote:
Loyalty - several companies believe that employee loyalty is a bedrock of their business.

In the last 5 years, I have seen loyalty becoming an true obstacle to disruption. Leaders who value loyalty, agreement in ideas and "yes" men fail to understand the changes in the market and continue to defend the status quo.

Jacobs Edo wrote:
Leadership, walking the talk and communication

Rob Bickford wrote:
Probably the biggest challenge many firms face is creating a culture that supports and embraces innovation. Corporate culture is not often perceived as a barrier to innovation. However, survey after survey demonstrate that corporate culture is identified as the most difficult barrier for innovation. Innovation is imperative for firms to survive in disruptive markets.This said corporate culture is the most consistent hurdle for innovation success,

Gary Desjardins wrote:
Hubris born of success. Often times when a company reaches a level of success, they get overconfident and stop doing what made them successful in the first place or ignore the need to continuously improve.
 

Change is Tough - Culture is deeply rooted in companies so it is very difficult to change. When culture is holding the company back, it requires strong commitment to change.

Defining new culture requires patience, sacrifice, boldness & vision. It requires passion of leaders to shine thru w/a clear desire for collective development & growth. Leaders must define & communicate common purpose aligned w/individual development goals complete w/a guarantee for future stability

'culture eats strategy for breakfast' (Drucker) So we have two big fights - first is external fight with disruptive market forces, second is internal fight with organization's culture and legacy. Most of the defeats happens in first fight due to internal culture, conflicts and politics.

Job one is to transform the culture from what it is to what it needs to be to outperform. The bad news is this is a multi-year process that requires the CEO’s close and constant attention. This is not something you can delegate to the health and happiness department.

Keep the Good - Strong cultures are often "disruption ready". Even weaker cultures have cultural strengths. Be sure to keep the best of the culture's values.

Unless a company's culture is inherently flawed or toxic, my recommendation is to build on it and strengthen it, not to view it as disposable even if there is a sense that "disruption" is becoming essential or even the norm. An organization's culture is its enduring promise/vision/values/purpose

It's important to keep the evolving startup culture alive even if organization grows. F500 firms should keep its inside child alive even if it turns 50+. Keeping startup spirit alive even at an age of 50 is possible when Employees are turned into Entrepreneurs for a disruption ready organization.

First, identify whether the entire company needs a culture change. Existing product lines are often responsible for the majority of revenue. Incremental innovation for existing product lines costs 80-85% of the company's budget and 15-20% is allocated for disruptive innovation.

Change Management - Changing culture is a long process requiring engagement. Senior leaders need to plan and demonstrate commitment.

Changing traditional to disruptive culture: 1. Understand what culture truly is 2. Promote upside, carefully manage downside 3. Purposefully develop/implement a marketing strategy of culture 4. Make sure behaviors of managers are consistent with the values 5 Ensure managers recognize employees

Create a company culture where employees, leadership, and stakeholders benefit: . 1. Recognize Employee Progress & Accomplishments 2. Promote Work-Life Balance & Model It 3. Ask for Feedback & Do Something w/It 4. Offer Professional Learning Opportunities 5. Encourage Real Lunch Breaks

Best Buy CEO followed below seven rules for turnaround: -Challenge employees to step up -Improve profits without cutting jobs. -Encourage faster decision making. -Embrace the power of “and.” -Stay positive. -Hold workers accountable. -Spread bad news faster than good news.

Cultural Role Models - Disruptive companies value disruption &offer examples traditional companies can learn from. One tactic is focusing on innovation programs as a catalyst for organizational change

I look at firms with a strong corporate culture, like Apple or Google, and believe disruption would be something the culture itself drives and thrives upon. A strong corporate culture would be an incubator of sorts for disruption.

Zappos is good example a company who leads culture from the top and drove disruption in customer-centric terms. Zappos trains external companies on how to lead a "Zappos-Like" culture, if companies are willing to pay for and train their employees on culture, it must be an authentic & powerful one.

Beauty accelerators aim to grow brands as quickly as possible thru a mentor-driven support culture. It’s win-win scenario involving collaboration and cross-pollination. Companies often take a equity stake in the startup, offer seed funding, and benefit from startup’s innovation &disruptive mindset.

Cultural Types - Traditional culture differs from disruptive culture. Some types of cultures are more conducive to disruption. Willingness to change is required for disruption (survey).

Traditional organization cultures naturally encourage consistency and predictability. They create layers of bureaucracy to approve decisions to avoid risk taking. They are internally focused to improve efficiency and build a hyper competitive environment to increase productivity. 

Disruptive cultures are passionate about being customer-centric, encourage creativity/innovation and reward intelligent risk taking. They develop agile leadership behaviors at all levels who build purposeful collaborative teams cutting across organizational boundaries to address new opportunities.  

Type of corporate culture either drives disruption or doesn't. Process driven - Not support disruption Client focused - Best chance of disruption Sales/financially driven - Maybe if disruption drives financial performance Personality cult - Maybe if key people have a disruptive idea

Cultural Maturity - Cultures change over time as the company matures. Remember, culture is deeply rooted.

Large F500s cultures need to keep shifting as the company goes through different lifecycle stages. Cultures can value different things at different stages. Different types of leadership needs to be brought in to accommodate.

Apple/Google get great press on culture since they enjoy once in a generation growth/proprietary protections for early entry companies. It'll be interesting to see how cultures stand up to future. Same story played out w/generational innovations like railroads, steel, oil, auto, aircraft, pharma.

Culture and values really are what is practiced every day by even the lowest level employees. It doesn't matter what is on the website or annual report and speeches by leadership. And the workers take their cues from leaders.

THEME #6

Disruption Predictors

THEME SUMMARY

Disruption is difficult to predict but early indicators can signal change is coming. Every company needs to monitor the market indicators most important to their business using resources and tools. Most important is to always understand ways to better meet customer needs and then deliver solutions.

  • Know your customer, know your business.
  • Track trends, follow the money.
  • Be ready.

Resources - Internal and external resources help to find signs disruption is coming. This includes futurists, academia, analysts, customers, suppliers.

Futurists identify trends, technologies and processes that benefit or affect their firms, companies or industries. A futurist is not about predicting the future but, instead, planning for potential scenarios. They paint a picture of possibilities so the organization can expect the unexpected.

An important area to monitor is what is happening in academia. A lot of disruptive technology is being developed by PhD students as they seek to push boundaries of their own scientific discipline. I have worked with a partner called CamIn who have access to top scientific research universities

Technology companies often use analyst forecasts to predict the size/growth of new markets or emerging technologies. Companies use the reports as "Credible & Independent" projections to justify going after new markets, ramping R&D spend, helping their customers justify purchases and secure funding.

Tools - Tracking systems help predict disruption. Examples are patent filings, alternative data mining, trends. AI systems may be able to help.

Posted 1 day ago Everyone tries to protect their ideas and intellectual property by filing for new patents. Global patent filing trends can be monitored in current and adjacent business domains. This indicates who is looking at the disruption horizon and in what way.

"Alternative data" is still fairly new and one of those cutting edge tools initially being used by Wall Street firms and Silicon Valley. Users are able to access multiple data sets to get a more holistic picture of disruption that is slowly brewing but no one yet knows about it.

We all know it already about how Artificial Intelligence is disrupting or going to disrupt several businesses. An extension of that thought process will be to build upon AI and further leverage predictive capabilities of AI to predict disruptions.

Principles - Prediction can be an intuitive thing, but there are structured ways to think about disruption. Each company needs to tailor a prediction model framework specific to their business.

Tools for predicting disruption may not be easy to describe but a eye for disruptive patterns can be used early warning system.

Key steps in uncovering disruptions: Determine the extent of the disruption.  Figure out what the disruption will mean to your business. Dig deep into design thinking to satisfy customer.

Firms need to develop/evolve a prediction model framework to continually evaluate forces likely to break market equilibrium becoming tipping point for industry disruption. Leading Indicators/metrics may be bankruptcy rates, M&A transactions, technology investment, new business models.

2 Financial - Tracking numbers gives clear direction. If the numbers are following the money they are even more powerful. Following investments, funding, bankruptcies, sales, profits provide insight

Follow the Money - Today's disruption generally requires plenty of capital. One of the most consistent ways to predict disruption of a company or industry is to understand where new entrants to markets are focusing. I closely follow the Private Equity, Venture Capital and Angel Investing spaces.

Monitoring VC funding, grants and other capital raises is a great way to find disruptive trends. But, sometimes the data is too scattered to tabulate. For example news stories might be difficult to manually collate. Using visualization solutions for machine intelligence can make this easier.

Quantitative is always better than qualitative.

Government - Changes in laws/regulations can immediately disrupt. Grant funding can show where research is headed. Tracking political, economic, social, & technology trends PEST is an early indicator.

Governments and regulators have extreme influence on various industries disruptions and growth and can be tracked as leading indicators. Overnight decisions changing policies/regulations causes disruption for many established firms. One needs to monitor emerging regulatory policies globally.

Another great way to monitor what is happening in the space is to monitor grant funding. Government is the major source of funding for research as well as early stage startups. There are multiple government agencies that have different pots of money for grant funding.

An “outside-in” sensory approach was the best way to find weak signals that could disrupt markets. Studying political, economic, social and technology (PEST) trends at their earliest stages were the most valuable precursor to determine disruption.

1 Customer Needs - Disruption happens to better meet customer needs. Knowing what leading edge customers are wanting and how startups are meeting their needs will show where the market is heading.

Another helpful approach is to regularly (e.g., quarterly) engage a panel of known leading-edge target users to discuss their needs, product/industry trends, and the features, performance, and characteristics they expect from next generation solutions.

I think the key identifier of disruption is customer dissatisfaction with current solution and existing unmet need. Most companies ignore this very basic premise of business. IF customers are unhappy, they're looking for alternatives. Product not do job Product too expensive Customer service is poor

Some ways to monitor the market startup accelerators (usually they select disruptive startups w/good growth); crowdfunding campaigns (products with a lot of support); customers' requirements (search results, inquiries, product feedback); partners' requirements from customers; universities research.