To achieve the stated goal the Convetit platform should be enhanced to provide:

1) far more attention must be paid to the ability to navigate with a structured set of menus (mission, themes, comments, mapping/rating/ranking answers, use of an auto-summarizer of all the collected comments
2) the ability to cross link boards with relevant information especially those from the META tab along with the ability to enter more terms as discussions evolve
3) the AI needs to harnessed to answer questions and then get the selected board members to validate or refute the answers
4) within a board, the facilitator needs the ability to be able to process more than one survey
5) provide the facilitator with a flow diagram, allowing the conversations to be more easily steered along selected pathways to achieve end points where a story can be produced.
6) provide direct links and from the notices to the actual message and highlight them
7) time stamp contributions to show the conversation flow
8) link to market research sources that provide up to date news items that can be tagged for the board awareness
9) the ability to bring additional experts in to answer one or two questions to provide an infusion of energy into conversations
10) a timeline map that can be altered to match the pace of the group but shows participants what the schedule is going to be for them to respond

Those ten items will serve to increase the value of the platform and accelerate the timeline for achieving the goal. I will think more on this question between sprints.

Convetit has a lot of potential. To become a global leader, I think the brand needs to position itself and its platform as a destination. It needs to increase its exposure. Convetit should be networking and marketing itself as a leader at what it does best. That can include traditional marketing, networking with thought leaders who have built up their followers, and businesses who would find its resources useful, and making bold claims and statements on social media to its targeted audience.

Convetit will also need to attract skilled professionals of various levels in a wide range of fields who can participate in the panels, and give broader feedback.

To to be a leader of anything, you will have to make sure your platform and technology is up to par as Sandy mentioned above.

The Dunning-Kruger Eeffect

This is a type of cognitive bias in which people believe that they are smarter and more capable than they really are. Essentially, low ability people do not possess the skills needed to recognize their own incompetence.

Best.

There are three types of opinion:

• Casual  
• Informed
• Expert

 IMHO: You need more of the second type, with far too much of the first type, currently.

Vetting?

Better vetting of panel members is needed.

All the members should be involved about convet it and their ultimate aim to prove it as best leader. Accordingly their contribution should be acceptable.